Ruth Ware released a new mystery yesterday, entitled The Turn of the Key. As a mystery lover, I’d been looking forward to this one.
If you’re looking for an explanation of the ending, it’s at the very end of the post (after the spoiler warning)!
Plot Summary
For the Detailed Plot Summary, click here or scroll all the way down.
In The Turn of the Key, Rowan gets a job as a live-in nanny, working for a wealthy couple in their technologically-advanced home. However, the longer she’s there, the more she can tell there’s signs that things feel a little off, from the misbehaving kids to the creepy garden of poisonous plants in the back. Soon, she hears from the locals and other people about the many stories of death and murder in the home’s enigmatic past.
By the end, Rowan will find herself awaiting trail for the murder of a young child, but how she ends up where and why are the questions at the heart of this haunted house mystery.
See The Turn of the Key on Amazon.
Book Review
In the book, the house in question was once the typical haunted house with a storied and mysterious history, but has since been gutted and updated to cutting edge technological standards by the current family, the Elincourts.
Ware presents a modernized version of the old Haunted House story. Instead of creaky doors and candlelight blowing out, there’s technology that malfunctions and user setting that are messed up so that lights don’t turn on. Is it as creepy as the old-school version? Maybe not, but it’s an interesting twist on an old mystery trope, so overall I had to give Ruth Ware props for trying it.
As the mystery deepens, there are a lot of intriguing elements that get put into the story. Some are fairly typical like creepy attics and disembodied footsteps, but I thought the garden of poisonous plants was a particularly creative touch that I haven’t encountered before, or at least not that I can remember.
That said, when the story concludes, it’s a little anti-climactic. It makes sense reasonably enough so I won’t completely discount it, but it doesn’t quite stick the ending.
There’s two minor twists that aren’t entirely set up properly. They don’t play enough of a place in the plot and there’s not enough clues throughout the book for it to feel like a real “reveal.” The final twist (the conclusion to the book) is just okay. It makes sense and is reasonably surprising, though it leaves so much of the other events in the book to be chalked up as random coincidences or things that amount to nothing that it’s not entirely satisfying.
Read it or Skip it?
This one is tough, because I did think the plot was interesting and mysterious. And the ending makes sense at least which is always nice. At the same time, the ending really was kind of a let down. The resolution doesn’t really have that satisfying feel when everything comes together. There’s a lot of details that seem like they should be part of the mystery but end up just falling away as creepy coincidences at the end.
I guess I would still recommend this book for people who like mystery-thrillers, but I’d describe The Turn of the Key as a fairly run-of-the-mill entry into this genre. I would definitely consider reading a different Ruth Ware book later though, since I thought the writing was fine and the story was interesting.
That said, if you’re looking for a haunted house story with a more solid ending, I’d recommend Lock Every Door which came out earlier this year by Riley Sagar, over this one. Still glad I read this one though!
See The Turn of the Key on Amazon.
Spoilers and Explanation start here! Don’t read beyond this point if you haven’t read the book! Keep reading if you’ve read the book, but have questions!
Where can I find a full plot summary of the Turn of the Key?
Right Here! For the full summary of The Silent Patient, scroll down a little (below the line break) and click Show/Hide Detailed Plot Summary
Is the Turn of the Key based on the Turn of the Screw by Henry James?
There are certainly homages to The Turn of the Screw in Turn of the Key, and the initial setup has some similarities. In both, the main character arrives to a large house as a governess/nanny and the primary guardian/parents is largely absent.
However, the actual plot of The Turn of the Key is vastly different.
How did Maddie have access to the attic in the Turn of the Key?
I’m not really sure about this one, but from the looks of it (based on what Ellie wrote in her letter), it sounds like she might’ve climbed from Rachel’s window up to the attic.
What happens at the end of the Turn of the Key?
In the end, we find out that Rowan’s real name is Rachel — she pretended to be her ex-roommate who had better qualifications than she did. Moreover, Rachel’s dad is Bill Elincourt, who left her mom when she was nine months pregnant. She applied for the job because she was Googling his name and saw it as a chance to get to know him.
We find out that the reason that the nannies keep leaving is because Bill Elincourt sexually harasses all of them. The first one (who stayed the longest) was Holly, and Bill had an affair with her. This is why Jean, Rhiannon and Maddie are so unfriendly because they don’t trust the nannies.
As we know from the beginning, Rachel becomes the prime suspect. She has written this letter in order to ask a lawyer for assistance. However, in the epilogue we learn that she never ended up sending the letter. Presumably, this is because she gets a letter from Ellie admitting that she (Ellie) was the one who pushed Maddie. Maddie was trying to get rid of Rowan/Rachel, and Ellie wanted her to stop. So, it seems like Rachel doesn’t send the letter in order to keep Ellie’s secret. In other words, no, I do not think Rachel ends up getting out of jail. But I think this is open to your interpretation.
Ellie also tells us that Maddie was the one who was messing around in the attic and who planted the antique doll head downstairs in order to scare Rowan/Rachel into leaving.
As a side note, some people have argued that the ending is left a little vague. Perhaps she did send the letter or perhaps something happened to her to prevent her sending them. I think you could reasonably make these argument, though I personally don’t think that’s the case here. The letters state clearly they were never sent and that Ellie admitted to killing her sister. I don’t see any evidence that points to anything else.
Very nice review 😊
thank you! :)
Thanks for such a thoughtful review. I will have to think about this one.
thanks for reading rosi!
It’s difficult when you read a book which PBS TV has definitively lauded but which does not add up or rise to the occasion. What the ___ happens with the main character at the end – I haven’t a clue!
haha yeah the ending comes really quickly and is a little ambiguous and not entirely satisfying. sigh. if you’re looking for thrillers that really stick the ending, I’d point you to The Silent Patient or Lock Every Door.
The ending was such a non event and so vague. Disappointing ending for sure
yeah it was a little abrupt, I agree
So did Rachel get out of jail or not? This was not clear.
I agree it was left a little vague. My take is that there’s no evidence that points to her being let out of jail so my assumption is no she does not get out of jail.
I was so disappointed in th end
The author didn’t even wrap up what happened to other characters.
Very disappointed to what happened to other characters.
yeah, it would have been nice to have a little more information on that, I totally agree!
I would like to think that the letters reach the authorities.Rachel will be absolved and Ellie will receive counseling.
Yeah, I just finished it and I have no clue what happened!!! Is Rachel in jail? Why didn’t she send the letters? How did bill react when he found out she was his daughter? How did Sandra react on that? More on Rhiannon? Really bummed at the ending, especially since the start was sooooo slow. I say it’s solidly a 2.5/5 star book.
Crazy, confusing ending…
Though the book started out slow I stuck with it because I was enjoying the way it was written with such details. Then the end came to a sudden halt with no details and too many questions. I hated the ending. The ending pretty much ruined the book. Why give so much detail to curtains blowing in the wind but none to what happened to important characters in the story. I felt like the author ran out of time and just had to wrap it up in 2 pages. 2 star book for me
I agree with your deductions and comments . It does explain that the letter was never sent. What was ambiguous was the comment that it was as well known case and ” we all know what happened. ”
So did Rachel kill herself? If she is serving in jail, she will get out.
I think the story line , that a devoted mother with a cheating partner, 1) doesn’t know what’s happening in her own home, 2) allows a perfect stranger to take over the first day she arrives, is ludicrous. Also, the daughter Rihanna, was with her. That she would be arrested was a bit far fetched too.
Agree that Ruth Ware is a great detail oriented writer.
Most of her protagonists are similar though.
So where is Rachel when the letters are found?
I believe Rachel never sent the letter to Wrexham because she read Ellie’s confession. To protect Ellie, she hid the letters and went to prison to protect her sister
That’s my assumption too. That’s the ‘twist’ in this mystery – that the questionable morals of the protagonist are redeemed by protecting her sister and her sister’s family, as far as she could do so. But I agree with the commentators who say that the ending was too abrupt and could have used more development, especially regarding the interesting and sad Rhiannon.
Very disappointing! Have read all her other books and enjoyed them. This one just didn’t cut it.
After listening to the audiobook and reading your summary, I still can’t figure it out: what was the deal with the phone in the attic? Did it belong to one of the earlier nannies? If so, when/how was it revealed?
Hi Dianne, oops, it looks like I left that out of the summary, I’ll add it in. Basically Maddie used the cell phone with Sandra’s PIN in order to have access to the controls of the house to scare her (like the night the music started blaring and wouldn’t turn off — Jack said only an admin user could have done it, which is Sandra/Bill, but it turns out it was Maddie). Hope this helps!
Soooooo, what are we to think became of Rachel? She died in prison? Wait, weren’t the orders found when they were tearing the prison down?
The prison was being torn down, but only 2 years had passed between the writing of the letters and them being found inside the wall?? So what happened to Rachel? Did the lawyer ever contact her? What happened in the court case? Is Rachel alive in 2019, or not?
A very loose and unsatisfactory ending to an otherwise decent story.
Something that doesn’t make sense to me. How did Maddie have access to the attic?
it’s been a while since I’ve read this but glancing at the letter that Ellie wrote, it sounds like Maddie climbed from Rachel’s bedroom window up to the attic window?
Did not care for the ending. The rest of the story is good but it needed 3-4 more chapters to have proper closure.
The reader is left hanging…I had to reread the ending a couple of times to be certain I hadn’t missed something. Left feeling disappointed.
Rowan taking the fall for little Ellie seemed a little unrealistic because the child wouldn’t have been prosecuted. I think her family probably knew the truth because a five-year-old is unlucky to keep a secret of this magnitude.
yeah, I have to agree with that. At worst it would’ve been psychiatric treatment that she probably needs anyway. I didn’t love the ending for a number of reasons — it sort of just stops, etc. But the build up of the story I think is well done.
Oh, really? Her mom was so clueless that she couldn’t see that her elder daughter was heading into trouble, her husband was a creep and Maddie had inherited her father’s psychopathic nature. This is an ending that really predicts the destruction of an entire family. The elder daughter will end up in big trouble, the younger daughter will hate herself because she believed she killed both her sister and her favourite nanny and her mother hasn’t learnt much at all. Sloppy plottting, this was.
Unfortunately SPOILER ALERT the fact that it didn’t seem to be of much consequence the content of the letter, I believe she was put to death. It seemed they only didn’t want to throw them out so they wouldn’t get in trouble. If had the potential to get someone out of jail, I think they would have reacted differently. We all know how that ended up sounds very permanent. Which sucks because I hate sad endings. I enjoyed the surprises and found it to be much like the authors others books. But I read to escape so I enjoy the satisfaction of a happy or just ending. This just sucks and It doesn’t bode well for a happy future for the little girl either. Oh well.
The death penalty in Scotland was abolished in 1969. I believe Rachel was found not guilty and that Ellie’s true nature was discovered and she started receiving therapy, which is why the construction crew said the letters wouldn’t make a difference.
I’m with Emily (9/3/2020) I think Rowan/Rachel must have died by suicide. She would have wanted to protect her sister at any cost. Overall, the ending seemed like an afterthought, with the beginning painfully slow. I listened to the audiobook and the narrator was terrific however it wasn’t enough for me to recommend this book.
I thought that because the letters were found, the lawyer Mr Wrexham, would get eventually get them. I need an ending where the truth comes out. Ellie would need therapy dealing with the fact that she killed her sister. Rachel was smart & would know that Ellie would need therapy. Bill needs to somehow get a punishment. I thought this story was hauntingly scary.
Why the hell was this book so fiercely recommended to me?? My 2 friends kept telling me it was so good but no! It was the most slow, frustrating , sudden no explanation ending I’ve ever read! Wast of time.
I recently discovered this author and lived a couple other books. This one is a loser, a disappointment and the end is bad enough to argue for a refund (stealing from your readers is wrong).
I had to go over the end to see if I missed something
I think it’s unclear what happened, but I think:
(1) nothing would happen to a 5 year old, so I find it highly doubtful that she would go to jail to protect her.
(2) I think she sent a letter to the housekeeper and immediately talked to a lawyer based on the new information. No way would that girl keep the secret. Eventually she would even be glad that an adult didn’t keep the secret.
(3) it says everybody knows the story, which I took to mean it all came out in the end. (I sure hope so, because otherwise the book is stupid and not reflective of common sense or normal human behavior.
(4) she did feel responsible, because she was out of the house, but chances are it wouldn’t have turned out different even if she was there. Feeling guilty enough to stay in prison for what a 5 year old did…. that is just stupid. No way did that happen.
I give the beginning a 2, the middle a 3.5 and the end a . 5
The point of the end is that you are supposed to be left without knowing what happened, you can use your imagination. This is an established literary device in fiction, if you don’t like it that’s fine but it doesn’t make this a bad book. The message from Ellie at the end clearly explains that the phone used in the attic was her mother, Sandra’s, old one, and that Maddie climbed out the window to get in to the attic through another one. Looks like some people commenting here didn’t read it very carefully.
This is the second book by Ruth Ware I have read, and I have to admit that she is very good at creating and portraying her characters. She also knows how to lure you into the story and to keep you reading it. But the ending, AGAIN, is the weakest part of the story, abrupt, not all logical and just leaving you wondering it it really was worthwhile..
I thought this was a terrific book, Ruth Ware does a masterful job with suspense and intrigue. The end is cliffhanger, as many authors choose to do. Life is a cliffhanger, which I feel is perfect, this makes you wonder and process what might have happened. Well done look forward to her next book.
I enjoyed the book until the ending. It was ruthlessly depressing: yes, we can assume by the “doesn’t matter anymore” that the heroine is dead and gone, but the implications are very grim for the surviving kids: an out of work, depressed mother, a self-destructive older sister, a youngest sister stuck in the middle, and Ellie has just killed both her sister and her beloved nanny (yes, as she ages, with all the media attention to the case, she will face that horror too). She can’t get help because she can’t let her mother know, her mother hates herself because she hired the “murderous nanny”, not knowing that was a lie, and it was stupid for the nanny to end herself (either by suicide or by risking getting murdered) because the kid would not have been jailed, but rather given the care and counselling she needs without coping with the guilt of more blood on her hands. So everybody in this family is doomed to death or addiction or severe depression except the worthless father, who would likely get away from blame due to the nanny taking it all. That was one of the most depressing endings I’ve ever read, and the ambiguity didn’t help. Stupid nanny, doomed family, lucky bastard.
If you look at the dates of the book. Rachel writes her letters from jail in 2017. The final letter written by someone who finds her unsent letters is only two years later. So if she is still in jail the letter from one of the little girls exonerates her. So she would get out of jail
If you look at the dates of the book. Rachel writes her letters from jail in 2017. The final letter written by someone who finds her unsent letters is only two years later. So if she is still in jail the letter from one of the little girls exonerates her. So she would get out of jail
No, the line that “It doesn’t matter” changes everything. If Rachel were still in prison, the letter becomes extremely important. In fact, it would be a crime to not deliver that letter to the authorities. If Rachel were released, the obvious solution would be to send a letter to Rachel telling her that they found stuff that belonged to her. Even if they weren’t sure they could find her, they would have discussed this as it’s the obvious thing to do: it belongs to Rachel, lets pass it over to her.
But the men don’t even mention that. The whole conversation has a melancholic feel to it, the men are not so much surprised as depressed at finding the letters.
The fact that the prison staff say “it doesn’t matter” about the letters suggest that Rachel was murdered in prison because if she were still alive, the letters would have considerable importance. If she had been exonerated and released, they would have wondered if she wanted the letters back. If she had still been in prison, these would have been even more important because they indicated that she was innocent. The fact that it didn’t matter means an innocent woman had been murdered by the other inmates (who hate child killers: look it up). That means that the younger daughter has to face the fact that she murdered both her sister and the nanny she cared for. This, considering how pathetic the mother was, makes everything far more ugly than it first appears. This is a poorly thought out ending.
A nanny who also happens to be her sister. With all the publicity in the case, Ellie is bound to find out some day that she was responsible for the death of two of her sisters!
I thought the letters were found by construction workers during demolition of the prison merely two years later, not prison staff?
All in all the ending was unsatisfactory.
The ending was horrible. The conversation among the male officials )and I am a male so I know the implications) strongly suggested that the poor girl had been murdered in prison (I don’t believe that she committed suicide because she had received those supporting letters and, face it, convicted murderers are viscous and really hate child murderers). I believe that Ruth had messed up with this ending because she later claimed that the heroine was alive, but if she were, why didn’t the men either consider sending her the letters (if she were exonerated and not convicted) or submit the letters to the authorities if she were still in jail (in fact it’s illegal to hide information that would prove someone innocent). They did neither. This means the poor daughter has to face the implication that she murdered both her sister and a nanny she cared about. Therefore, the elder sister would have ended up in the streets and the middle daughter would have been suicidal. What the hell were the author and her reviewers thinking of?
Face it. The final conversation of the officials about the letters they found imply a horrible ending. If Rachel were still alive and in prison, these letters become so important that getting rid of them instead of submitting them to the higher authorities becomes a crime (withholding evidence). If she were exonerated and release, these letters become her properties and they would have considered either returning the letters to her or asking whether she wanted to pick them up. Neither options were considered. The language felt as if there was something tragic happening. So Rachel was murdered (and not necessarily quickly, considering she was surrounded by hardened criminals). Now the younger daughter has to cope with two deaths she caused, so we’re looking at a suicidal child. I really think Ruth didn’t think this through clearly, as we have one elder daughter likely ending up in the streets, one mother completely devested and probably drinking herself to death and one infant doomed to end up in foster care.
I have realized, with some research, that the story missed a crucial bit of evidence: the police can prove that Rachel did have sex with Jack that night. This is because the police can test for semen and other fluids in the bed, search for hair and fingerprints and even do a gynelogical exam on Rachel to prove that she had Jack’s semen in her. Therefore, the question is what happened to this overwhelming evidence for her alibi? Also, Ruth gives us so little information that I don’t see any reason that Ellie succeeded in pushing her sister off the roof. How did Maddie climb from the window to the roof? Remember that the attic window was closed for the first time. Also, why was there no scream from Maddie?
I loved this book. I read all the comments and I think the ending was thought-provoking. It may have been abrupt, but it was a shocker to me that Ellie killed her sister. At first I thought that Rachel would’ve killed herself in prison but after reading the comments from Mr. Worsick, I think she was killed by the other prisoners. The suspense kept me reading long after my bed time. I really wanted to know who was gaslighting Rachel. Couldnt believe it was Maddie. The children were strange but they had a lot of upheaval in their lives, so I didn’t automatically think one of them was the culprit in making Rachel think she was going crazy. I’ve read In a Dark Dark Wood and The Woman in Cabin 10. Loved both of them. I’m going to find The Death of Mrs Westaway next to read.
Can someone explain to me what TBH means. “TBH, I don’t imagine it matters now” that was in the letter written by one of the construction workers
Hi Carol, TBH usually means “to be honest”
hey guys, i need some help here, i am doing a book report on this novel and i need to know what the book theme is. Ive tried so many ways to find it but i just cant seem to. anybody know what it is? thanks
I believe Rachel was executed for the murder of Maddie. She hid the letters when she received them, went to her grave and the letters were found long after when nothing could be done. This book was the most frustrating to read because it was so drawn out and unnecessarily detailed only to drop me like a hot potato at the end. The “protagonist” made horrible self sabotaging choices. The mother of those children was unrealistic at best careless at worst and I find it hard to believe that any mother would allow an absolute stranger near her children regardless of age. The idea was great but extremely poor execution.
You do know that there’s no capital punishment in the UK?
Just finished this. Regarding whether Rowan/Rachael gets out – I think it is likely that she could, based on the evidence that has just been uncovered… assuming that the papers are given to the police.
Whether or not that happened, we will never know I guess. I enjoyed this book 😌
I went to a bookstore (since what I read was a borrowed book) and looked up crucial sections of the book. The letters were not sent to police but to somebody in the construction company. Nobody would have been able to decipher Ellie’s letter if they didn’t read most of Rachel’s letter. Therefore, the letters would have likely been trashed or filed away. I was right about the tone: to a man like me, it sounded very much like a Dead Rachel ending. I also realized that the crucial clue was that Maddie didn’t scream or yell, nor did she protect her head with her hands, which would be instinctive. Therefore Maddie was unconscious when she fell. This means that Ellie didn’t kill her sister. Maddie must have been holding onto a vine so she dropped out of the window but didn’t fall, still holding onto the vines. The police would seize that fact and charge that Rachel knocked Maddie out and threw her out the window. But what probably happened is that Ellie climbed up to the attic, put in Rachel’s phone and necklace (if she fell when Ellie pushed her, how did those items get there?) and slipped, banging her chin or forehead against the windowsill (leaving a blood stain that nobody looked at). Perhaps a vine broke. This means Rachel gets murdered and Ellie eventually commits suicide because of a wrong belief. Ugly.
I just finished this book and I really felt like the ending was lacking a LOT, very dissapointed in it. Made me feel like I wasted my time reading it 🤦♀️
eeek sorry to hear it!
I have sat down and re-read and analyzed certain parts in this book to try to gain a better understanding of the ending. I agree with the majority that feel the ended was cut short without any clear explanation to what happened to Rachel. This is what I personally feel happened. Rachel had originally wrote Mr. Wrexham 5 letters which it states she crumpled up. On page 11 in the book it clearly states that Rachel did in fact send out a letter to Mr. Wrexham. The letter she sent him was 5 pages long and was dated September 7th, 2017. Rachel started to write Mr. Wrexham another letter on September 12th, 2017 because she had waited three days and hadn’t seen or heard from him. This is the letter that never got sent. *as a side note it took her 2 days to write a 5 page letter so you can imagine how long it would have taken her to write a 320 page letter.* In Rachel’s letter that got sent to Mr. Wrexham she lets him know that she put his name down for a visitor’s pass to come and see her. You can find it on page 10 of the book. I know that Rachel did not get sentenced to death because in Scotland the death sentence was abolished in 1969. Also, in Scotland they can only hold someone for 140 days before a trial. You will also see this mentioned on page 9 of the book. I don’t believe that Rachel was murdered either because among the pile of letters she wrote to Mr. Wrexham there was the letter from Jean McKenzie and Ellie. I’m not positive because I haven’t gone back to re-read the book from start to finish but I thought Rachel mentioned that an inmate tried to go after her so the prison guards moved her to some place else for her protection. I know that in some high profile or high publicity cases a prisoner will be placed in a private cell or in isolation for their protection. Some examples would be a police officer, a child molester or a child murderer. Also, if she was murdered by an inmate the inmate would of ripped up the letters or the letters would have at least been thrown out while cleaning out her cell. On November 1st, 2017 Jean McKenzie wrote Rachel a letter less than two months since Rachel wrote Mr. Wrexham’s letter. If Rachel was murdered or committed suicide Jean McKenzie would have heard about it either in the headlines or on the news considering it was such a huge case. Also, if Rachel was dead Jean McKenzie’s letter would have been sent back to her with the return address. On page 333-334 in the book Jean McKenzie wrote in her letter to Rachel that if there was anything in Ellie’s letter to her that she thought either her or Ellie’s mother should know about that she must tell them. Jean McKenzie also stated that she will do whatever needs to be done to help Rachel. No one knows what other letters Rachel sent out since she received the letter from Jean McKenzie and Ellie. My conclusion is that; 1) Mr. Wrexham used the visitor pass to see Rachel so she was able to tell him everything. Therefore, there was no need to send the final letter to him. 2) Rachel wrote back to Jean McKenzie and told her what Ellie had admitted to her in the letter. In this senecio Rachel would not keep a secret like that knowing that the truth would exonerated her and because Ellie was only 5 if anything she would receive counseling, she did actually save Rachel’s life from Maddie. I feel Rachel wouldn’t have any use for the letters once she knew she would be exonerated so she stuffed them in the wall. Two years later a construction worker from “Ashdown Construction” came across Rachel’s letters hidden in the wall while demolishing the prison. He ended up giving the letters to a guy named Phil who he hoped would pass them on to the proper authorities, not wanting to be on the wrong side of the law. Phil, who didn’t know about Rachel or her case wasn’t sure what to do with them. On July 8th, 2019 he placed Rachel’s letters into a packet along with a letter to Richard McAdams who was in charge of “Ashdown Construction Services”. Once Richard McAdams received the packet he would be obligated by law to send it to the local police department. Before the prison got demolished all of the prisoners including Rachel (if by chance she was still incarcerated) would of been relocated to other prisons. If this was the case why would Rachel not take the letters with her? My belief is that Rachel did get released and eventually found out where Sandra had relocated to and at least went there to see her and her sisters.
Dave Worsick:
By the time the men found the letters, Rachel would have been tried. That means that she was taken from that Remand Centre and sent to trial. If found guilty, she would have been sent to an English-Wales prison, NOT back to the remand centre. Therefore, she hid those letters knowing that she’d never have access to them again. However, every letter going into the prison system is read by prison staff FIRST and any letter they didn’t understand would have been held back. So they would have interviewed Jean about the letters. They knew about Ellie’s confession. This is a major plot problem, as the only way they’d release that letter is if they completely discounted Ellie’s confession (otherwise, they’d keep it secret and just drop the charges, releasing Rachel without a detailed explanation). That would be because Maddie was unconscious when she fell as she should have instinctively protected her head and kids that age can survive falling one and a half floors. Maddie was too reckless to be frightened enough to faint (research psychopathy) and the police know she tried to murder Rachel, so they would have convicted Rachel saying she knocked Maddie unconscious and threw her out. So, she’d be in a high security prison surrounded by violent nut cases and guards that really hate her. That’s why “it doesn’t matter now” seems so ominous. If the wreckers just didn’t care, they’d shred the letters right away and not waste management’s time with that memo.
Hey why isn’t anyone asking this? I mean the book never said who did Ali the other stuff to scare Rachel such as ringing the house at mid night or playing the loud music when everyone was sleep? Was it Maddie? But she didnt have access to HAPPY… I’m just so confused and I hope someone will help me with this
Ellie states really clearly in her letter that Maddie was using her mom’s old phone to control the house. “By playing tricks with Mummy’s old phone” — one that would’ve been signed in with Sandra’s permissions and thus could control everything with admin-level access.
Just finished reading this. enjoyed it. Maybe I formed an opinion in my own imagination but I think that after she read her little sister’s confession letter she decided to take the wrap out of sisterly love and to keep the letter secret she put them in the wall. The letters weren’t discovered until two years later during a construction project and the man sending the email to another obscure man ( who hinted that “it made no difference now” ) could have given more detail. but he said “not that it matters anymore“ indicating to me that they probably executed her or that she died somehow with the secret intact. I’ve read this author before and she does like to have that Shocking twist, so maybe that’s why I was ready for it. I think it’s gonna make a great movie if they do decide to make it. Nice book
Scotland abolished the death penalty in 1969. One plot hole: non-attorney jail mail is opened and reviewed by prison staff. Meaning Ellie’s confession would have been known, with Rachel therefore being acquitted, with no need to hide Ellie’s letter.
This book was so bad, I didn’t bother to finish it. The “f” bomb was used so frequently it was hard to even like the main character. She was wooden and not at all sympathetic. The rest of the characters were as ridiculous as she was. I am glad I got this book at a discount. I would be angry if I had paid full price for this piece of worthless fluff.
Reading all of these comments, it’s clear that we all want a happy ending, where justice is served, bad guys are punished and good guys don’t rot in jail, or worse. The fact that this is not what we get in this book is what makes this book truly terrifying. What is scarier than psychopathic children growing up with oblivious adults? Or innocent people taking the blame for something they didn’t do and being punished accordingly? Or hearing the desperation in Rachel’s words to the lawyer one minute and hearing silence the next? Yes, the ending is jolting, and thats exactly the feeling I think we are meant to have. We are jolted into the final realization that this situation will not be fixed, no matter how evil Bill is, no matter how pathetically damaged Elle is, and no matter how well meaning and innocent Rachel is. And THAT is terrifying.
I was under the impression that several letters to the Attorney were written before she got the letter\confession fron Ellie. Why didn’t she send those?
Kinda a side thought but – So are we suppose to believe Maddie was the one tending to the poison garden? Rachel noticed it looks tended while before tying the door shut. So Maddie was sneaking out and doing this? And she’s the one who left the poison flower in the kitchen? And that she got the berries to poison Rachel before jack put the big lock on the door?
A wonderful review, thank you!!
Plot hole—Incoming prison mail is reviewed (unless it’s correspondence between prisoner and defense attorney), so the prison staff would have discovered Ellie’s confession, and the need for Rachel’s trial would have been moot.
I don’t think Rachel would have committed suicide. I think she would have wanted to stay alive to fight for her surviving sisters’ well-being.
The death penalty in Scotland was abolished in 1969. I believe Rachel was found not guilty and that Ellie’s true nature was discovered and she started receiving therapy, which is why the construction crew said the letters wouldn’t make a difference.